Of course, what I said doesn’t mean that I agree with Che Guevara’s position. In fact, Che Guevara made quite a number of statements. In the end, Mohican people were tragic. Its strength came from passion rather than sex. Che Guevara’s sensational tone was strong and unquestionable. The dancing in the theater was all the strength of the proletariat. Three true revolutionary men were full of righteous conscience. When they hit the floor with a wooden stick, they listened to the Guevara sound behind the theater when their eyes were confused. But the sound from the other side of the loudspeaker always made me have a pure reaction. Who made it? You Che Guevara, a mortal guy, turned into a saint and became the embodiment of true meaning, but this kind of imperative tone tells me that it should be like this and not like that. This kind of cultural revolution poster-style discourse violence often reminds me of the sentence, where there is oppression, you should resist. Maybe you should resist first before resisting the oppression of the rich on the poor. This is the moral thought of discourse power.
Bug II is far less exquisite in form than the first one. The gap between Meng Jinghui and Mayakovski can be seen from this, but in comparison, I am even more bug II. The first one focuses on the publicity of form, while the second one is an ideological experiment. In Bug I, Meng Jinghui criticized the Soviet Union for obliterating individualism, and his words were eloquent. Che Guevara advocated the revolution and spared no effort to achieve the same quality. In Bug II, Meng Jinghui finally found it difficult, and he was no longer constrained by the expression of capitalist socialist individuals. It’s very rare that the ideology of the socialist type is entangled. Our avant-garde director has finally stopped fighting in the past, although he hasn’t come to tell us what he saw forward.
Bug’s second revolution neither called for revolution nor bid farewell to revolution. Perhaps in Meng Jinghui’s eyes, this era will eventually be a farce. Che Guevara concluded that vigorous revolution is the immortal historical determinism and always believes that history will end.
Although I am firmly opposed to the theory of consanguinity, I do believe that these two plays are completely different. Zhang Guangtian and Meng Jinghui are dressed in unusual clothes. One is a troubadour singer and the other is a pioneer director of the school, Mr. Fashion.
It happened that Qin Hui was sitting in front of me when I was watching Che Guevara, and I was fortunate to observe his reaction. According to two scenes in the drama I observed, Qin Hui was the most involved. One scene was that the intellectual circles in Beijing were calling a technical seminar entitled Farewell to Revolution, and the other scene was when the bourgeois lady shouted the strongest voice and the weakest voice of this era, idiot. Hehe, when the revolution was over, this emphasis on fairness, justice and rationalism was distracted, but I saw that he shook his head when he left, although this was due to his applause as a courtesy and to my applause as a upbringing.
year
Such a confusion to live.
There are many kinds of life puzzles, but there is a more fundamental confusion in the state confusion, which I call existential confusion, including the most important life significance problem of life and death limit
Most of life is like sliding on the ice of a smooth mirror. Suddenly, Wan Li, if you are unwilling to wait for such a watery year, you will try to nail your boots or do something else. Just like a stonemason chiseling a mountain, the hammer falls on the chisel, and everything is so strong and firm. But the pain is meditation, but love can be long, repeated thoughts or sadness. Generally speaking, this kind of nail boots makes you closer to your soul and less confident. In this process, you can experience every minute of your life carefully. Every detail of it completely enlarges the texture of life, which is closely related to the fact that you realize the moment of life in a moment to replace eternity, so you firmly believe that this is the state of life as it should be, and this is the best way to escape from the enemies of life, such as empty despair and death. You are convinced that at this moment, we can finally escape from the madness of life and go to the unfair fate to rob the reincarnation forever.
Is that really the case?
Among idiots, Dostoevsky made a condemned man want to die. How wonderful it would be to get his life back. It would be endless eternity, and this eternity would all belong to me. At that time, I would turn every minute into a generation without any waves, and I would never let every minute be wasted. Then the prisoner was really commuted and the endless eternity was given to him. So what did he do with this huge fortune later? Did he manage every minute carefully? No, he didn’t. Dostoevsky’s conclusion is that we can see that the experience is before us, and if we really spend every minute carefully, we can’t live without knowing what.
I can’t cross it.
Proust approached his soul through illness, covered with heavy eiderdown silk, and peeped at the world through the gap in the closed velvet curtain. He said that patients feel more close to their souls, but he also said that life is the same thing that sticks too close. It keeps hurting our souls, and once they feel shackled for a while, people can experience meaningful fun.
Too close to life will hurt the soul, too close to the soul will alienate it, but it will not come to an abrupt end. When the soul lowers its eyebrows and lifts its eyes, it will jump over and lengthen the state into life. This is how life is completed. However, the soul is still meditating in the jungle moonlight, thinking about what to do without Lulu.
So we decided not to plan our life sexually. We will have great contempt to belittle life, belittle everything, live fantasy, illusion, curtain, happiness, happiness, warmth and closeness, and so on. In this great contempt, we can experience another kind of power, a source of life’s bottom power, sturm und drang, to wipe out everything. We finally grasp the quality of life. Here’s what life looks like. You poor, deceived ants, Nietzsche lived like this, but Nietzsche first destroyed his own life, and then the philosopher. Children will never abandon life so desperately again. Russell Sartre is the best example. Russell said that there are three irresistible pursuits in my life: one is the unstoppable pursuit of truth, the other is the unstoppable pursuit of love.
Indulging in a single thing is enough to prove that we are fragile and boring. On how lofty this thing is, a triangle is the strongest construction method. Russell here really makes such a solid triangle from love. Russell’s inspiration is not to try to find the answer from love in philosophy, because there is no need for truth here.
year
Anxiety and courage
Reading aloud is a German country. Since 1995, Harder Schlink has been translated into several languages, and it has quickly become an international bestseller. We know that after the war, German rose from the ruins, and now it is in front of the world. This gesture has never been reborn in the slightest. Pride is penetrating into the heart, repenting Auschwitz’s tragic camp, and anti-humanity crimes are like a shadow spell that makes it difficult for every conscience German to turn around. Even Gunter Grasse, the upstart of the Nobel Prize for Literature, can’t read it at first sight. Reading aloud is easy to fall into popular reading. The trap also seems to imply that this may go astray. Hannah, a 15-year-old teenager and a 36-year-old young woman, has been romantically and strangely in love for many years. After seeing her life, Berger witnessed her lover’s status as a guard in the Nazi middle camp. Now a series of thoughts on the crime of the middle camp in the courtroom seem to show a theme that is not new.
However, it is obvious that the Germans are unwilling to bow to the stereotype, so that they will not be satisfied with the plane phenomenon description and simple moral condemnation. As the reading continues, we find that Hannah is illiterate and she doesn’t want others to know the secret. She gave up the promotion opportunity in Simon Company and joined the company to keep the secret. She relishes Berger reading every novel to her, but she always reacts strangely and keeps the secret. Even if she admitted in court that she was the Nazi executive who wrote the report, it would have been impossible for her to write the report. She couldn’t even write her own name, so Hannah kept the secret so carefully. In her decades of career as a Nazi camp, she actually kept such a trivial secret. She was illiterate.
It’s hard to imagine what such a fact really means, but I guess it means a shame for Germans, especially for Hannah, who can’t find her own identity in a modern society composed of words, so when personal shame says that the country and the nation are human righteousness, the problem suddenly becomes acute. Do you try your best to maintain the remaining self-identity or are you willing to give it up?
Sandorozak said that we live in an era in which personal identity and personal destiny are sought, and private experience has become a major subversive political force. This kind of political concept is completely different from the unified meaning. Anthony Giddens said that life politics simply means that it is focused on the background of the post-unification, which causes political problems in the process of my realization. In the 1930 s, Germany was an era in which the unified value was completely subverted, and the emperor died and ended up with two kinds of things, or gave up the value and meaning, and asked to enter the illusory state or died, and later generations found it again. Looking for courage Nazi Germany was an attempt by Germans to find courage in the 1930 s. Of course, their choice was wrong. Now the question is whether Hannah chose Nazi or modernity. I agree.
Hannah may not be aware of this problem, but she is also practicing it. Obviously, she doesn’t want to make a simple imagination like Sophie chose Schindler’s list. These imaginations give the world a complete explanation, but at the cost of losing the complexity and authenticity of facts, and on the other side of good and evil, a more obscure field, where moral judgment may seem abrupt.
Hannah was born in a very difficult situation. A former Nazi camp guard faced with moral pressure from the national government. An illiterate, she obtained her approval from words. Due to the strong pressure of superego, the only way I can maintain Hannah is that her body is finished in the blank method to erase her memory. Hannah’s clearest image is that she smells fresh and sweaty. In Bai Ge’s view, she is too clean. Every tryst, they must go through the procedure of bathing and having sex. Bai Ge doesn’t understand this. The ceremony means something to Hannah, but Hannah knows that the body is the only place she can find, and I agree that the body is also the only way for her to borrow the world of the white box. This is what she hopes to get back into life, that is, this passage is hopelessly narrow.
Hannah was unusually attentive when she was reading in Bagger’s recitation. Listening to her laugh, she sniffed, and her anger or admiration exclaimed undoubtedly showed that she followed the plot nervously. It was in this role substitution that Hannah’s virtual writing career was not as virtual as real life, but it was also good.
When she was finally sentenced to prison for decades, Hannah still didn’t give up her body. The first and only time I saw Hannah in prison, she was already an old woman with white hair, deep wrinkles and a heavy body. She smelled like an old woman. This can’t blame Hannah for almost desperate resistance. She sent her a recording tape word for word in German in prison. She even wrote a letter to Baige outside, first a few lines of greetings or thanks, and then to a woman. A poem, a story, a novel, a character’s comment on her writing forsythia in the courtyard, or I hope there will be more thunderstorms this summer. She commented that Schnitzler is barking that Steven Zweig is a dead dog or Goethe’s poem is like a small painting embedded in a beautiful frame. However, Bagehot never wrote back to Hannah except that she kept reading aloud. Hannah kept sending reading tapes, waiting anxiously for Bagehot’s reply in prison, even a few words, but she never went to the warden to tell Bagehot that Hannah had been paying attention to it for more than ten years before she went to prison. She kept fit and she was a little too clean, but then she overeated and seldom took a bath. She became bloated and smelled something. Hannah died the day before Hannah’s commutation prison, the day before Bagger decided to welcome her back to the world. She finally gave up her world efforts.
Hannah’s death was not due to complete despair of rejoining her life. In fact, Hannah has never lacked such courage. Perhaps her problem lies in whether she is good or not. Now we may be able to answer that question. Hannah chose not to be a Nazi, but to belong to her own way of life. However, in any case, Hannah’s choice constituted practical politics, and then she went from dark territory to moral judgment. That’s how life politics happened.
At the end of the novel, Hannah left a legacy to the families of the victims in Zhongying, and the child who survived in that year finally accepted this penitence symbolically. Tobag transferred it to the Jewish Anti-Blindness League. Hannah suspected that she was guilty, but this fact never denied it, but it also prevented us from being moved by Hannah’s eagerness for the real life. Maybe the courage of the group does come from some grand narratives and sensationalism, but for the individual, the courage comes from some secret anxiety. So where are you and me anxious?
year
Bell tolls and travels.
Melancholy tropical suspicion is a very attractive name. Putting these five words on my lips is like seeing the paintings of Rousseau, a French surrealist painter in the 19th century, which are full of hot and humid tropical atmosphere. The cover color is taken from the Amazon River, the green Brazil rubber plantation, and the two fine colors are put together, and the complex patterns have already presented a calm, fragile, rich temperament and sexy.
The interesting thing is that in Rousseau’s famous exotic landscape map, two or three kinds of external images can be seen after plant textual research. Almost all the plants are in Rousseau’s imagination, while in Levi Strauss, although I have seen strange plants such as thyme, grass, rosemary, basil, frankincense and pistachio, they are all based on evidence. There is no exaggeration here. The grotesque cultural imagination words are all written under the conditions of witnessing the record. On the morning of March, 1934, I took a boat from Marseille Port to Santos Port several times since then. Hair is mixed in memory to leave a few special impressions. First of all, the winter in southern France is full of a special entertainment atmosphere. This narrative method does not remind people of Duras-style foreign land feelings, but it has real appeal because of human culture and human family identity.
Melancholy tropical is not a pure technique. Mythical thinking in Strauss’s other human masterpieces is a structure. Compared with melancholia tropical, human beings are more like the greatest human family in this century. Because they don’t pursue grand narrative theory, there are not many restrictions on writing.
The master’s bosom does not allow Levi Strauss, like those literati who are always ready to be moved and ready to express their feelings at any time, to tremble and try to exaggerate their emotions in the traces of historical sites. This is just a good writer. The report of science and technology writers is full of excitement but does not show any trace. Some Chinese people are full of luck when writing cultural essays.
Obviously, this kind of writing is very easy to meet the cultural imagination of reading exotic feelings, being humble and curious. I have been reading this five-page tome with great joy, but it is a truly saying that I hate traveling, and I hate explorers, but I have repeatedly woken up. This is not relying on some fragments to recreate a lost local color in vain. On the contrary, this is a travel book that rings the death knell.
It is the innate ability of westerners to paint food with the same taste with a bottle of ketchup. After the enlightenment, the western language is strong and the danger of not being coated with ketchup is more likely to be genetically transformed into a tomato. Levi Strauss is obviously deeply worried about this. He said, but human beings choose to plant a plant and are now creating a popular language, just like beets are planted in large quantities, and this is the only thing that future generations can enjoy every day.
However, Strauss didn’t stay in the simple romantic mood of returning home, and he was always wary of cultural advantages. At the same time, he was deeply aware of the condescending humanitarian hypocrisy. He said that I was trapped in a circle, and the more difficult it would be for different human beings to escape, the more it would be to reduce the mutual pollution caused by mutual contact, but at the same time, different people would reduce the opportunity to get to know each other and appreciate each other’s advantages, so as to know the significance of diversity. In short, I could have the opportunity to see all kinds of things with my own eyes like an ancient trip. Wonders and visions, but I can’t see the significance of those phenomena. I deeply hate and despise those phenomena, otherwise it will become a modern journey to pursue all kinds of traces that are no longer true. No matter which point of view I look at, I can fail and fail miserably, which is worse than it seems. It is heavy and nai to think like this.
In the face of history, cultural relativism and absolutism are not really at the highest point, but cultural human beings can satisfy one kind of history except intellectual knowledge, and human beings connect the two extremes of world history and our own history, thus showing the reason why the two parties are in common, and then studying all kinds of human differences and changes that are meaningful to human beings without studying things that belong to a single writer. Perhaps those special texts will not change their fate if they are observed and watched from outside, but Levi Strauss believes that he is capable of telling others that one will never be the same. The way to reproduce the order of different stages of unique events, the exhausted research materials, and the various styles and customs have made his personality life harmonious, and this is what human beings can give to the world
Melancholy tropics is such a state of mind of introspection, criticism and criticism. In the words of JaesB’s evaluation of it, this was and still is one of its own culture, and the French West is also a denial of this culture. It is also a denial of the century. It also denies that China and the West have pursued their different cultural and political destiny of ruling the world in other centuries.
At the end of the growth of a human family in section 7, Levi Strauss seems to have casually noticed such an episode. After a savage tribe in California was slaughtered, an Indian miraculously came to life. In the following years, he didn’t attract attention around several big towns. He still beat stone chips to make hunting stone arrows until the animals gradually disappeared. One day, the Indian was found naked and hungry on the outskirts of a suburb. People saved him and later he spent the rest of his life peacefully as a handyman in California.
Strauss didn’t make too many comments on this story, but it is meaningful to make the ending of this story about the growth of a human family. When there is no human being on this planet, it is certain that there will be no human being when this planet is destroyed. Who will be the last Indian and who will be the last city handyman in such a long period of time?
year
See the light of day again
Oscar Wilde said that life imitates art, and later people believe this sentence, which makes Dostoevsky call it higher truth. Proust obviously agrees with him that life will eventually be revealed and rediscovered, so it is the only life we really experience.
Of course, we can imagine a life without art or literature, but at the same time, it may be that human beings are in a degenerate state, and art or literature does not guide life, saving life and even creating life. People are no longer addicted to the trivial state of daily life and re-examine their own world from a spiritual point of view. Proust is convinced that his novels have the function of being able to read themselves through me.
If you still have doubts about Proust’s speech, then look at Biemel’s exhortation. If China readers do Proust’s speech, they can realize that happiness can be obtained through artistic analysis, because art is not that we are alienated from life, but that we may solve our problems and achieve our harmony.
Biemel is a philosopher, so in the analysis of contemporary art philosophers, we expect him to reveal to us the three possibilities of philosophical art life.
Biemel’s choice of Kafka Proust, Picasso’s model of contemporary art can be accused of being deeply impressed by these three names after reading the cultural history of the century.
The lives of the three masters are very different. Picasso is colorful. It is well known that Kafka’s life is mediocre and uneventful. His two failed relationships may be the most dramatic page of his life, and Proust is even more lacking. His lifelong lingering bed is covered with heavy eiderdown and he is peeked at the world through the gap of closed velvet curtains. From the third reality, it seems that life does not live in art, but perhaps this is a good proof. Proust has repeatedly expounded his position and realized that things are completely different from experiencing things. In fact, the richness of life does not depend on the accumulation of events. In fact, it is more about realizing the meaning and understanding the spirit

Categories: